The Mexican
Revolution: Federal Expenditure and Social Change
Since 1910
By James W. Wilkie
(Berkeley: University of
California Press, 1967; 2nd ed., revised, 1970)
For the Spanish Translation further
revised and enlarged, see
La Revolución Mexicana: Gasto Público y Cambio
Social (1978 y 1987)
Debates about the Book in
English:
Debate 1:
Thomas E. Skidmore and Peter H.
Smith:
"Notes on Quantitative History: Federal Expenditure
and Social Change since 1910,"
Latin American Research
Review 5:1
(Spring 1970), pp. 71-85
Paste in browser:
Versus
James W. Wilkie
"On Methodology and the Use of Historical Statistics,"
Latin American Research
Review 5:1
(Spring 1970), pp. 87-91
Paste in Browser:
Debate 2:
Felix C. Boni and Mitchell A.
Seligson
"Applying Quantitative Techniques to Quantitative
History: Poverty and Federal Expenditures in Mexico,"
Latin American Research
Review 7:2
(Summer 1973), pp. 105-110
Paste in browser:
Versus
James W. Wilkie
"On Quantitative History: The Poverty Index for
Mexico,"
Latin American Research
Review,
Vol. 10, No. 1 (Spring, 1975), pp. 63-75.
Also
Debate 3:
Kenneth M. Coleman and John
Wanat
"On Measuring Mexican Presidential Ideology Through
Budgets: A Reappraisal of the Wilkie Approach,"
Latin American Research
Review 10.1
(Spring, 1975), pp. 77-88.
Versus
James W. Wilkie
"Coleman and Wanat Fail to Prove that Wilkie's
Budgetary Analysis Does Not Reveal the Personalism of
Presidential ldeology in Mexico"
Extract from JWW Rebuttal
in Money and Politics in Latin America, pp.
xv-xvii.
En James W. Wilkie and Kenneth Ruddle (eds.)
(Los Angeles: UCLA Latin
American Center Publications, 1977)
JWW also develops above his argument by quoting James
A. Hanson and Enrique Baloyra on their case studies that
support the his approach to budgetary analysis, see:
|